Validation of SURE, a Four-Item Clinical Checklist for Detecting Decisional Conflict in Patients

Audrey Ferron Parayre, Michel Labrecque, Michel Rousseau, Stéphane Turcotte et France Légaré

(2014) 34(1) Medical Decision Making 54.

Résumé (dans la langue de publication) :

Background: We sought to determine the psychometric properties of SURE, a 4-item checklist designed to screen for clinically significant decisional conflict in clinical practice. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of a clustered randomized trial assessing the effect of DECISION+2, a 2-hour online tutorial followed by a 2-hour interactive workshop on shared decision making, on decisions to use antibiotics for acute respiratory infections. Patients completed SURE and also the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), as the gold standard, after consultation. We evaluated internal consistency of SURE using the Kuder-Richardson 20 coefficient (KR-20). We compared DCS and SURE scores using the Spearman correlation coefficient. We assessed sensitivity and specificity of SURE scores (cut-off score ≤3 out of 4) by identifying patients with and without clinically significant decisional conflict (DCS score >37.5 on a scale of 0–100). Results: Of the 712 patients recruited during the trial, 654 completed both tools. SURE scores showed adequate internal consistency (KR-20 coefficient of 0.7). There was a significant correlation between DCS and SURE scores (Spearman’s ρ = −0.45, P < 0.0001). The prevalence of clinically significant decisional conflict as estimated by the DCS was 5.2% (95% CI 3.7–7.3). Sensitivity and specificity of SURE ≤3 were 94.1% (95% CI 78.9–99.0) and 89.8% (95% CI 87.1–92.0), respectively. Conclusions: SURE shows adequate psychometric properties in a primary care population with a low prevalence of clinically significant decisional conflict. SURE has the potential to be a useful screening tool for practitioners, responding to the growing need for detecting clinically significant decisional conflict in patients.

Cliquez ici pour consulter cet article.

Domaines :

À propos de l’auteur :

Audrey Ferron Parayre est membre du Centre de droit, politique et éthique de la santé de l'Université d'Ottawa. Ses intérêts de recherche et d'enseignement portent sur le droit des personnes, le droit de la santé, les droits et libertés fondamentaux, l'effectivité du droit et le transfert de connaissances. Son parcours interdisciplinaire l'a amenée à recourir à des méthodes de recherche empirique, tant qualitative que quantitative, dans ses différents projets de recherche.

Cliquez ici pour visiter sa page web de la Faculté.

Haut de page